<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Back With A Vengeance</title>
	<link>http://richardflynn.net/articles/2006/12/24/back-with-a-vengeance/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Flynn</title>
		<link>http://richardflynn.net/articles/2006/12/24/back-with-a-vengeance/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Flynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 15:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://richardflynn.net/articles/2006/12/24/back-with-a-vengeance/#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Apologies for the fact that I didn't employ the phrase 'actually factually', 'wonder(ing)woman' (if that &lt;strong&gt;is&lt;/strong&gt; your real name…).  I must try harder. Perhaps I'll be able to squeeze those two words into my next piece. Look out for that, and don't forget to read extra-specially carefully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies for the fact that I didn&#8217;t employ the phrase &#8216;actually factually&#8217;, &#8216;wonder(ing)woman&#8217; (if that <strong>is</strong> your real name…).  I must try harder. Perhaps I&#8217;ll be able to squeeze those two words into my next piece. Look out for that, and don&#8217;t forget to read extra-specially carefully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wonder(ing)woman</title>
		<link>http://richardflynn.net/articles/2006/12/24/back-with-a-vengeance/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>wonder(ing)woman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 15:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://richardflynn.net/articles/2006/12/24/back-with-a-vengeance/#comment-95</guid>
		<description>'Omittance is no acquittance' (&#38; deplorable failure to use actually factually btw) x</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Omittance is no acquittance&#8217; (&amp; deplorable failure to use actually factually btw) x</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Flynn</title>
		<link>http://richardflynn.net/articles/2006/12/24/back-with-a-vengeance/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Flynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 13:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://richardflynn.net/articles/2006/12/24/back-with-a-vengeance/#comment-94</guid>
		<description>So, where does it say ‘actually factually’, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, where does it say ‘actually factually’, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wonder(ing)woman</title>
		<link>http://richardflynn.net/articles/2006/12/24/back-with-a-vengeance/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>wonder(ing)woman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 11:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://richardflynn.net/articles/2006/12/24/back-with-a-vengeance/#comment-93</guid>
		<description>Dear Pedant, Is the use of 'actually factually' allowed?  What might its literal sense be do you suppose?  Please help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Pedant, Is the use of &#8216;actually factually&#8217; allowed?  What might its literal sense be do you suppose?  Please help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali Blackwell</title>
		<link>http://richardflynn.net/articles/2006/12/24/back-with-a-vengeance/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali Blackwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 02:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://richardflynn.net/articles/2006/12/24/back-with-a-vengeance/#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Richard, what a lovely site. I'm going to investigate this WordPress phenomenon. Is it the future? It all moves so quickly, doesn't it? x</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard, what a lovely site. I&#8217;m going to investigate this WordPress phenomenon. Is it the future? It all moves so quickly, doesn&#8217;t it? x</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
